51
Tesfaye Kebede, Daniel Zewdineh ,Assefa Getachew , Kumlachew Abate . Ethiop Med J, 2022, Vol. 60 No. 1
ASSESSMENT OF THE LEVEL OF JOB SATISFACTION OF RADIOLOGISTS
PRACTICING IN ETHIOPIA
Tesfaye Kebede MD1 , Daniel Zewdineh MD2, Assefa Getachew MD3, Kumlachew Abate MD4
ABSTRACT
Background: Professional satisfaction is a key factor in delivering quality medical care. However, the level of professional satisfaction of radiologists, among others, in Ethiopia has not been assessed so far. In light of this, this study hopes to determine the Level of Professional Satisfaction in Ethiopian Radiologists.
Methods: The study is a
Results: Eighty radiologists participated in the study of which 2/3rd was males, and 53.9% were younger than 45yrs of age, with an overall satisfaction rate of 62.8%. Male radiologists (p = 0.01) aged
Conclusions: The survey demonstrated a comparable level of professional satisfaction of Ethiopian radiologists with those of other countries. Professional satisfaction is associated with work arrangement, gender, and age group in addition to years of experience, and place of work. It was also able to determine that income has a major influence on professional satisfaction.
Keyword: Ethiopia, Job Satisfaction, Radiologists
INTRODUCTION
Satisfaction of medical professionals is a key factor in delivering quality medical care. It is important to note that, not only is it vital to keep the professional moti- vated to stay in their respective specialty; it is also an indirect measure of patient outcome (1). In addition, it affects patient care by also increasing the tendency of professionals to unionize and participate in a strikes (2, 3).
Professional satisfaction is also strongly associated with patient satisfaction
Factors affecting work satisfaction may also vary de- pending on time, with changes in practice, patient load, and income over time. Published works also show that close to half of all radiology professionals reported a decreased level of satisfaction in their job, as compared to five years prior (7, 8).
Although there are published research works in Ethiopia that analyze the radiological services, no published works so far investigate the level of satis- faction among radiology professionals. Therefore, the main aim of this survey is to do a baseline as- sessment of the level of professional/ job satisfac- tion of radiologists in local practice.
METHODS
Study design
This was a
Study setting
The study was conducted in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia during the 22nd annual conference of the Radiology Society of Ethiopia.
1Associate professor of Radiology, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, 2Professor of Radiology College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, 3Associate professor of Radiology College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa Univer- sity, 4Assistant Professor of Radiology St. Paul Hospital Millennium Medical College
Correspondent author Tesfaye Kebede. Email: kebedetesfaye@yahoo.com
Study population and procedure
The study participants were all radiologists who have a minimum work experience of two years. 40 out of 140 radiologists who have work experience of less than two years were excluded from the study. The remaining 100 met the inclusion criteria. Among those eligible, 80 of them consented to participate in the survey.
Data collection and analysis
Data was collected using a structured questionnaire which contains sociodemographic characteristics, area and type of practice, staffing character, work sched- ule, number of institutions that the radiologist is work- ing or practicing in, stability within the current institu- tion, and career plans. Satisfaction was measured us- ing a
Ethical considerations
Participation in the survey was voluntary. Informed consent was obtained from all respondents, and indi- vidual identifiers were not used during data collection. Ethical clearance was obtained from the Research and Ethics Committee of the Department of Radiology. Permission was obtained from the radiology society.
RESULTS
Out of the 100 eligible radiologists, 80 of the partici- pants in the study complied making the response rate 80 %. Around 2/3rd of the respondents were males and 55.1% of them were <45yrs of age (Table I).
All levels of professional experience above 2 years were represented and only 1.3% of the respondents were above the age of 65 (figure I & II). Among the participants, 68% of the respondents had
Concerning the area of practice, 88.8% of the re- spondents were practicing either in Addis Ababa or other larger cities. 88.4% were in clinical practice during the time of data collection and 70% percent of the respondents were
52
The overall satisfaction level of radiologists in this study was 62.8%., 31.3% of respondents reported to be satisfied with their current monthly income and 53.8% of respondents were indifferent. Con- cerning stability of respondents, 83.8% of respond- ents were stable during the past two years with 52.3% having no plan to change their current working place within the next one year. Among the participants, 78.8% also had a plan to keep the current practice rather than change practice or ca- reer path (Table I).
Radiologists who were male and in the age group of 35
=0.02 & 0.01 respectively). (Table II) Radiologists working in larger cities other than Addis Ababa also reported to be satisfied than those working in Addis and smaller cities. Those who were working in small cities reported more dissatisfaction than those radiologists working in Addis Ababa and other large cities, respectively (P
The study also found that those radiologists who had longer years of experience (>11yrs) were more likely to encourage
Figure I: Age distribution of Ethiopian radiologists participated in the survey, Addis Ababa, 2017 GC.
Figure II: Category of years of professional experi- ences of Ethiopian radiologists, Addis Ababa, 2017GC
53
Table: I:- Professional and Practice Characteristics of Ethiopian radiologists, Addis Ababa 2017GC
|
|
Frequency |
Percent |
|
|
|
|
Area of Practice |
Addis Ababa |
42 |
52.5 |
|
Other large cities |
29 |
36.3 |
|
Small cities |
9 |
11.3 |
|
Total |
80 |
100 |
Private |
41 |
51.3 |
|
|
Government |
37 |
46.3 |
|
Uninformed services |
2 |
2.5 |
|
Total |
80 |
100 |
Staffing Character |
Academic |
22 |
27.5 |
|
Clinical |
58 |
72.5 |
|
Total |
80 |
100 |
Work Schedule |
Full time |
56 |
70 |
|
2 |
2.5 |
|
|
Both |
22 |
27.5 |
|
Total |
80 |
100 |
Number of institutions |
One |
40 |
50 |
|
Two |
29 |
36.3 |
|
More than two |
11 |
13.8 |
|
Total |
80 |
100 |
Satisfaction with Income |
Extremely satisfied |
4 |
5 |
|
very satisfied |
21 |
26.3 |
|
indifferent |
43 |
53.8 |
|
very dissatisfied |
10 |
12.5 |
|
Extremely dissatisfied |
2 |
2.5 |
|
Total |
80 |
100 |
Institutions the Past 2yrs |
No |
13 |
16.3 |
|
Yes |
67 |
83.8 |
|
Total |
80 |
100 |
Plan to Change Work Place |
Yes next 6months |
16 |
20 |
|
Yes next one year |
22 |
27.5 |
|
No |
42 |
52.5 |
|
Total |
80 |
100 |
Career Plan |
keep practicing |
63 |
78.8 |
|
change practice |
16 |
20 |
|
Make career change |
1 |
1.3 |
|
Total |
80 |
100 |
54
Table II. Satisfaction According to their
`Category |
Encourage |
p- |
Recom- |
p- |
Satisfaction Compared to what was before 2yrs |
|
|||
|
College Ages |
Val- |
mend Radi- |
Val- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
to Join Medi- |
ue |
ology |
ue |
Highly/ |
No change |
Extremely/ |
||
|
cine n(%) |
|
|
|
Somewhat |
n(%) |
Somewhat |
|
|
|
|
|
n(%) |
|
Satisfied |
|
Dissatisfied |
|
|
|
|
|
|
n(%) |
|
n(%) |
|
||
Age Category |
|
|
|
|
|
0.02 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
<=35 |
10(76.9% |
0.18 |
19(95.0% |
0.17 |
16(64%) |
3(12%) |
4(16%) |
|
|
16(88.9% |
6 |
14(82.4% |
5 |
15(79%) |
0(0%) |
4(21.1%) |
|
||
14(73.7% |
|
11(73.3% |
|
8(40%) |
8(40%) |
4(20%) |
|
||
13(100% |
|
13(100% |
|
9(60%) |
4(26.7% |
2(13.3%) |
|
||
>=65 |
|
|
1(100.0% |
|
1(100%) |
0(0%) |
0(0.0%) |
|
|
Sex |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01* |
|
Female |
17(85%) |
0.89 |
23(95.8%) |
0.13 |
14(48.3%) |
9(31%) |
4(13.6%) |
||
Male |
36(83.7%) |
7 |
35(83.3%) |
4 |
35(68.6%) |
6(11.8%) |
10(19.6%) |
|
|
Years of Experience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
0 to 5 Years |
14(87.5%) |
0.01 |
24(96%) |
0.19 |
20(69%) |
3(10.3%) |
4(13.8%) |
||
|
|||||||||
6 to 10 Years |
17(68%) |
* |
14(77.8%) |
3 |
17(65.3%) |
5(19.2%) |
4(15.4%) |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
>=11 Years |
22(100%) |
|
20(87%) |
|
12(48%) |
7(28%) |
6(24%) |
|
|
Level of Training |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.23 |
|
General radiologist |
50(84.7%) |
0.60 |
55(88.7%) |
0.41 |
47(63.5%) |
14(18.9%) |
11(14.9%) |
||
|
|||||||||
Subspecialist |
3(75%) |
6 |
3(75%) |
5 |
2(33.4%) |
1(16.7%) |
3(50%) |
|
|
Place of Practice |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<0.00* |
|
Addis Ababa |
28(82.4%) |
0.59 |
30(88.2%) |
0.98 |
23(54.7%) |
13(31%) |
4(9.5%) |
||
Other Large Cities |
20(83.3%) |
6 |
22(88%) |
3 |
21(72.4%) |
1(3.4%) |
7(24.1%) |
|
|
Small Cities |
5(100%) |
|
6(85.7%) |
|
5(55.6%) |
1(11.1%) |
3(33.3%) |
|
|
Academic |
15(78.9%) |
0.46 |
13(86.7%) |
0.87 |
13(59.1%) |
3(13.6%) |
6(27.3%) |
|
|
Clinical |
38(86.4%) |
|
45(88.2%) |
|
36(62.1%) |
12(20.7%) |
8(13.8%) |
|
|
Satisfaction with |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<0.00* |
|
Extremely satisfied |
3(100%) |
0.10 |
2(50%) |
0.06 |
4(100%) |
0(0%) |
0(0%) |
||
very satisfied |
16(100% |
1 |
21(100%) |
4 |
19(90.45) |
2(9.5%) |
0(0%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Indifferent |
30(81.1%) |
|
30(85.7%) |
|
24(55.8%) |
12(27.9 |
7(16.3%) |
|
|
very dissatisfied |
3(60%) |
|
4(80%) |
|
1(10%) |
%) |
7(70%) |
|
|
Extremely |
1(50%) |
|
1(100%) |
|
1(50%) |
0(0%) |
0(0%) |
|
|
dissatisfied |
|
|
|
|
|
1(50%) |
|
|
|
working in the same |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
institution during |
45(83.3%) |
0.67 |
48(88.9%) |
0.59 |
39(58.3%) |
13(19.4%) |
13(19.4%) |
0.03* |
|
the Past 2yrs |
|||||||||
Yes |
|
3 |
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Plan to Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Work Place |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.04* |
|
Yes next 6months |
6(66.7%) |
0.30 |
12(92.3%) |
0.81 |
74(3.8%) |
4(25%) |
3(18.8%) |
||
Yes next one year |
14(87.5%) |
1 |
16(88.9%) |
4 |
15(68.2%) |
3(13.6% |
4(18.2%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
No |
33(86.8%) |
|
30(85.7%) |
|
27(64.3%) |
8(19%) |
7(16.7%) |
|
|
Career Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<0.00 |
|
Keep practicing |
53(84.1%) |
- |
45(84.8%) |
0.13 |
40(63,5% |
12(19%) |
11(17.5%) |
||
Change practice |
|
|
13(100%) |
5 |
9(56.3%) |
2(12.5%) |
3(18.8%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Make career change |
|
|
0(0%) |
|
0(0%) |
1(100%) |
0(0%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Statistical test was calculated at P<0.05
DISCUSSION
The survey revealed that the overall satisfaction of radiologists is 62.8%. Given the relatively low level of satisfaction, most radiologists have been stable at their current positions for two years and have no plans of moving to other places in the coming year or changing career paths.
So far many studies have been published locally and internationally addressing issues of satisfaction among Ethiopian healthcare workers including general practi- tioners and specialists
Radiologist satisfaction can be affected by many fac- tors, such as income, physical working environment, freedom to choose work method, recognition for good work, job security, and career prospects (14, 15). There are also differences in the level of satisfaction among the different age groups and gender. Most works of literature also demonstrated changes in the level of job satisfaction over time (7, 15, 16).
The level of job satisfaction also was shown to be different among radiologists working in different countries and even in different institutions within a
specificcountry. This is due to the difference in the determinants of job satisfaction, and the overall satisfaction of radiologists in the published works of literature, which ranged from 49.5% to 93% (7, 8, 14, 15). Our result also fell within this range.
Despite few reports which showing no difference in satisfaction among males and females (14, 15), most literature report the contrary (7, 14, 16, 17). Similarly, our study showed most males reported a higher level of satisfaction than females. In the authors' opinion, Gender differences in satisfaction among radiologists, found both in our study and other works of literature, arise from the different factors and tools used to meas- ure satisfaction.
In contrast to most studies that reported that academic,
55
In addition, radiology equipment downtime in the academic departments is long due to a shortage of budget for equipment maintenance and a lack of preventive and corrective maintenance agreements. On the other hand, private radiologic facilities usu- ally get maintained quickly because of lack of bu- reaucratic channels and the income they present. As a result, these factors may contribute to the low levels of satisfaction reported by academic radiolo- gists in comparison to private practitioners.
A high level of job satisfaction was also reported from those working in the same institution for two years and above with intentions of staying for at least one more, during the data collection. The possible explanation may be related to fulfillment within their given employment. Job satisfaction is one factor for radiologist turnover intention (18).
Similar to reports in other pieces of literature, our survey showed that there is no statistically signifi- cant difference in the level of satisfaction between
Conclusion and Recommendations
This survey showed that Ethiopian radiologists have a level of satisfaction comparable with radiol- ogists in the rest of the world. Being female, younger than 35 and older 44, academic radiolo- gists as well as, working in the capital city, Addis Ababa, were associated with a low level of satis- faction.
The authors recommend investigating factors af- fecting the level of job satisfaction among radiolo- gists and running comparative studies between the different disciplines or specialties.
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank all those who par- ticipated in the survey and the radiological Society of Ethiopia for facilitating data collection.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declared no sources of financial sup- port or conflict of interest
56
REFERENCES
1.Haas JS, Cook EF, Puopolo AL, Burstin HR, Cleary PD, Brennan TAJJogim. Is the professional satisfaction of general internists associated with patient satisfaction?
2.Burke RJJSS, Medicine. Stress, satisfaction, and militancy among Canadian physicians: a longitudinal investigation.
3.Kravitz RL, Shapiro MF, Linn LS, Froelicher ESJAjoph. Risk factors associated with participation in the Ontario, Canada doctors' strike.
4.A. Katz,
5.Haas JS, Cook EF, Puopolo AL, Burstin HR, Cleary PD, Brennan TA. Is the professional satisfaction of general internists associated with patient satisfaction? J Gen Intern Med.
6.Sundquist J, Johansson SE. High demand, low control, and impaired general health: working conditions in a sample of Swedish general practitioners. Scandinavian journal of public health.
7.Zafar HM, Lewis RS, Sunshine JH. Satisfaction of radiologists in the United States: a comparison between 2003 and 1995. Radiology.
8.Beitzel K, Ertl L, Grosse C, Reiser M, Birgit
9.Yami A, Hamza L, Hassen A, Jira C, Sudhakar MJEjohs. Job satisfaction and its determinants among health workers in Jimma university specialized hospital, southwest Ethiopia. 2011.
10.Temesgen K, Aycheh MW, Leshargie CTJH, outcomes of Job satisfaction and associated factors among health professionals working at Western Amhara Region, Ethiopia.
11.Gedif G, Sisay Y, Alebel A, Belay YAJBrn. Level of job satisfaction and associated factors among health care professionals working at University of Gondar Referral Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia: a
12.Mengistu MM, Bali AGJSJoPH. Factors associated with job satisfaction among healthcare workers at public hospitals of West Shoa zone, Oromia regional state, Ethiopia: a
13.Graham J, Ramirez AJ, Field S, Richards MA. Job Stress and Satisfaction Among Clinical Radiologists. Clinical Radiology.
14.Magnavita N, Fileni A, Bergamaschi A. Satisfaction at work among radiologists. La radiologia medica. 2009;114(8):1330.
15.Sone M, Mizunuma K, Nakajima Y, Yasunaga H, Ohtomo K. Job satisfaction, income, workload, workplace, and demographics of Japanese radiologists in the 2008 survey. Japanese journal of radiology. 2013;31(5):364- 70.
16.Kubik HJSmw. Professional satisfaction of radiologists in Switzerland. 2011;141(3940).
17.
18.Yeo